• Alternative proteins can create jobs
  • Manufacturing and logistics are growing fastest
  • Losses will mainly occur in the meat sector
  • The transition requires new skills
  • Skills mismatch is a major risk
  • Retraining is a key factor
  • Some skills are transferable
  • Livestock farmers are the most vulnerable group
  • Biotechnology opens new positions
  • The new roles are more skilled
  • Better jobs do not come automatically
  • Success depends on a managed transition

Expectations

Industries producing meat substitutes, whether plant-based or cultivated meat products — grown in laboratories — are developing rapidly. According to a multi-regional study carried out by experts in Brazil, the USA and Europe, published by GAIA, alternative proteins could capture up to 60% of the meat market by 2040. This raises a key question:

Will alternative proteins create jobs — or destroy them?

Surprisingly, the expert consensus is clear: net job creation is likely — but only if countries properly manage the skills transition and regional strategies.

Experts expect job growth across the alternative protein value chain

  • 87.5% expect new jobs in inputs/ingredients
  • 91.4% expect new jobs in manufacturing
  • 83.9% expect new jobs in distribution/logistics

Alternative proteins are technology-heavy and process-heavy sectors with strong demand for:

  • Engineering
  • Bioprocessing
  • food science
  • manufacturing
  • quality control
  • regulatory compliance

These are generally higher-skilled and better-paid jobs.

Trends

Where job losses arise

The impacts are concentrated in:

  • livestock farming
  • feed production
  • slaughter and meat processing

~56% of experts predict net job losses in the conventional meat-processing chain if plant-based and cultivated products reach scale.

Reasons:

  • reduced livestock volumes
  • reduced demand for feed
  • closure/consolidation of slaughter facilities
  • technological efficiency

A challenge we may not have thought about is how to move — not simply replace — the lost workforce.

The skills mismatch problem

Experts are unanimous:

  • 78%: livestock workers do not have the qualifications needed for alternative-protein jobs
  • 47%: downstream meat-processing workers have some transferable skills
  • Engineering and biotechnology positions require more advanced training

This mismatch makes retraining and reskilling the most important policy lever.

Which workers are best suited for transition?

High convertibility

  • Meat-processing workers could find roles in plant-based manufacturing
  • Quality-control staff could move into food safety
  • warehouse/logistics workers could move into cold chain and distribution
  • maintenance technicians → automated production operations

Medium convertibility

  • feed crop farmers → legumes for human food
  • mixed farmers → diversified crops

Low convertibility

  • farmers working only in livestock farming
  • slaughter specialists

These people require structured support: diversification grants, buyouts and retraining.

New high-growth job clusters

1) Research and Development and bioprocessing
Bioreactor operation, growth-media development, tissue engineering.

2) Manufacturing and automation
Extrusion, mixing, fermentation, robotics, utilities.

3) Ingredient production
Protein extraction, milling, oil/fibre processing.

4) Regulation and safety
Approval, certification, documentation of novel foods.

These sectors offer higher job quality than conventional meat.

Leave a Reply